Will 2012 be the year of 'creating shared value'?

Will 2012 be the year of 'creating shared value?'

I've been thinking about my colleague Ben Richards' last blog post advising our clients to let go of the word sustainability in 2012. In the post, he argues that as terms, both 'sustainability' and 'corporate responsibility' are ineffective at engaging mainstream audiences.

Whether too inclusive or just plain unappealing, it's clear that businesses are still undecided on how to best package the range of issues that sit underneath these umbrella terms in one, catch-all phrase. And is it any wonder? Given the ever expanding list of sustainability issues faced by companies, coupled with the need to target multiple audiences- it's almost neigh-on impossible to capture everything in a way that appeals to all. Or is it?

This month marks the year anniversary of Michael Porter's HBR article on 'Creating shared value' (CSV), the latest piece of terminology to emerge from the corporate sustainability space. A year on, the concept has been embraced by business leaders and sustainability practitioners alike and continues to grow in popularity. So, what's the appeal and, more importantly, is it the solution we've been looking for?

What is creating shared value?

'Creating shared value' (CSV) attempts to re-balance value creation by highlighting the linkages between economic and social progress. In short, the concept proposes that businesses and the communities in which they operate are mutually dependant and that therefore what's good for society is also good for business. A novel concept, but does it work?

Well, as far as messaging goes, creating shared value certainly ticks all the right boxes. Despite not being drastically different from its counterpart terms 'sustainability' and 'corporate responsibility, CSV does a far better job at presenting the win-win benefits of sustainability to mainstream audiences.

For senior management, the term presents a clear business case, whilst removing the 'do right or else' mentality of responsibility. For non-specialists, CSV moves beyond the discipline led-nature of sustainability, making actual outcomes more relevant and meaningful. And for mainstream audiences (such as consumers and communities), the notion of 'shared value' encourages engagement and collaboration.

What's perhaps most interesting though, is evidence that CSV works in generating buy-in and engagement. Nestlé's 'Creating shared value' campaign has drastically boosted the firm's profile in the corporate sustainability space over a very short space of time. Evidence of engagement around the campaign has also been prominent, with Nestlé's dedicated CSV Facebook page generating almost 13,000 likes from customers.

The new sustainability?

Although CSV does a great job at bridging the language barrier that prevents mainstream audiences from engaging in sustainability, there are bigger issues when delving into the theory.

Firstly, the term isn't as encompassing as sustainability in terms of the breadth and depth of issues it covers. By focusing solely on the business case for value creation, CSV leaves potential for businesses to overlook traditional moral values if they fail to serve a specific business function. This could be a dangerous and slippery slope, particularly if fundamental issues such as diversity and human rights are overlooked.

What's more, CSV calls on business to make the distinction between which activities do or don't have the ability to add societal value. But this leaves room for misinterpretation. The aviation industry, for instance, may be seen as adding fiscal and social value by facilitating international trade and creating jobs, however the industry is also a significant contributor to global emissions and can tear apart local communities. So does the industry add societal value or take it away? CSV doesn't yet provide us with a succinct answer that allows us to distinguish between these trade-offs.

Ultimately though, creating shared value is certainly a more engaging way of talking about sustainability. By making the objectives and outcomes clear to mainstream audiences, CSV creates a clear and easy-to-understand case for sustainability that previous terminology fails to capture. For this reason it's certainly a step in the right direction, but not quite the all encompassing solution we've been looking for just yet.

Post a comment

Some of our contributors

  • Isabel Collins

    Isabel Collins
    Passionate about music, family, comedy and helping people get closer together.

  • Ben Richards

    Ben Richards
    Sustainability stories for all audiences

  • Christian Bates

    Christian Bates
    Life's not just about football, well not all the time.

  • Daniel Jones

    Daniel Jones
    Youngest member of the RY sustainability team - big music fan, avid gig-goer. Old head on young shoulders.

  • Jonny McCaig

    Jonny McCaig
    Avid Guardian reader and big thinker

  • Tom Corser

    Tom Corser
    Making sure information can be found quickly and easily, with a bit of "hmm, nice!"

  • Martin Skeet

    Martin Skeet
    Brand consultant, a passion for employee engagement and moving image.

  • Oliver Dudok van Heel

    Oliver Dudok van Heel
    Raising awareness of the sustainability agenda.

  • Matt Lyndon

    Matt Lyndon
    Formula one loving, curry eating, Brummie.

  • Richard Coope

    Richard Coope
    Digital, social media, moving image, Landrovers & dad stuff

  • Jim Bodoh

    Jim Bodoh
    Complex brand thinker, interested in what makes us tick.

  • Sally Smith

    Sally Smith
    Musings on people, usability, content, psychology and hiking.